Jumia

Friday, June 8, 2018

Europe faces a choice over Iran: uphold its values or surrender its credibility | View

Now Reading: 
Europe faces a choice over Iran: uphold its values or surrender its credibility | View
EU foreign ministers with Iran's Javad Zarif
© Copyright :
Reuters
TEXT SIZEAaAa
The withdrawal of the United States from the Iran nuclear deal framework – known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – between Iran and the EU/E3+3, and the myopic support for this action received from some regional actors, has potential far-reaching consequences for international peace and security.
Since its withdrawal, the hawkish US administration is unremitting in trying to completely shut down the JCPOA, a goal which lies at the heart of its so-called grand strategy on Iran.
Europe cannot allow the genie of reckless unilateralism to be unleashed. 
Peiman SeadatAmbassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the European Union
The fruition of years of intense multilateral diplomacy is now on critical life support. Without effective and timely intervention, the JCPOA will simply die. Farcically, the agreement may expire, exactly because it has worked so well, mainly due to Iran’s faithful compliance and restraint. In fact, the Trump administration was in violation of the terms of the deal since its first day in office. The Office for Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) of the US Treasury Department did not issue a single license; instead, it advised extra due diligence. The ill-intentioned tenor of recurrent uncertainties hindered major businesses and banks from engaging with Iran.
To be clear, the US unilateral withdrawal on its own does not kill the JCPOA. However, what does cause even greater alarm is that the party in defiance seeks to also extend its dominance to the Europe and other participants of the agreement. What steps should be taken, in particular by the Europe, to save the patient?
First, the principle of international multilateralism must be emphatically reaffirmed. For many historical, political and economic reasons, multilateralism remains core to Europe’s identity and cohesion. The withdrawal from the JCPOA is at the height of Trump’s vociferous assault on multilateralism. Following scrapping the Paris Agreement and moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem, he is now up to a full-fledged trade war, to name a few. Europe cannot allow the genie of reckless unilateralism to be unleashed.
Second, Europe must act according to its core values. Ever since the Marshall Plan, transatlantic ties have been a key force of Europe’s trajectory. The US withdrawal from the JCPOA has massively contributed to an unprecedented rift in transatlantic relations. Europe, however, appeared to try to ‘manage’ or ‘tame’ Trump. This approach proved to be futile, as the US President has seldom changed his stance due to consultation with allies in Europe. Even as Europe continues to think strategically and act according to its core values, the reality and magnitude of the damage President Trump inflicts might well lead to irreversible damage. The increasingly volatile situation in the Middle East is only one such example. Europe is faced with a choice. If Europe chooses, during the Trump Administration, to give priority to the transatlantic ties, it risks running against its very own principles and values, and only undermines its sovereignty and credibility.
Third, Europe and the remaining parties to the JCPOA must act to preserve the integrity of international law and of the UN. The deal was sealed and became part of international law by the UN Security Council Resolution 2231. Trump’s zeal to nullify Obama’s legacy comes at the cost of undermining the very principle of state responsibility in public international law.
Fourth, Europe must highlight the strategic value of the JCPOA for international and regional peace and security. President Trump does not seem to comprehend that killing JCPOA is to the detriment of security for everyone. Policies of bullying and intimidation only increase the likelihood of dangerous counter measures, with the potential to spiral into uncontrollable conflict. The JCPOA, in particular, continues to generate a momentum for engagement and dialogue towards defusing tensions in the Middle East. Europe and other remaining signatories should not give in to policies that are injurious for regional and international peace and security.
Fifth, JCPOA’s non-proliferation clause must be upheld. Practically, through the most stringent verification regime in its history, the IAEA has confirmed Iran’s compliance with the JCPOA on eleven separate occasions. Pushing a successful non-proliferation regime towards economic collapse can only lead to disaster. Such actions simply encourage disengagement and, moreover, undermine the credibility and core competencies of the nuclear watchdog, the IAEA. For strategic reasons, Europe and the remaining signatories need to preserve the non-proliferation prominence of the agreement.
Sixth, Europe needs to acknowledge and reward Iran’s compliance with the agreement. Iran has been the complaint, not the violator. JCPOA can survive without the singular party in withdrawal, but it cannot endure without Iran. Rather, it is Iran’s trust which needs to be regained. Expressions of commitment are essential and in place. This needs, however, to be complemented by deliverable guarantees of Iranian economic gain, as warranted under JCPOA, and will now require extra and time-bound efforts by Europe and the remaining agreement parties.
Iran’s self-restraint to date should not be misinterpreted. Iran cannot be expected to implement an unbalanced deal. In the absence of concrete guarantees and reassurances from Europe and the remaining participants, upon its ongoing preparations, Iran has no choice but to explore its own options to act in accordance to its national interests.
The JCPOA is a strategic stabilizer for regional and international peace. But to rescue and preserve its existence, Europe and the remaining signatories must choose cohesive and timely action.
Peiman Seadat is ambassador of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the European Union
Opinions expressed in View articles do not reflect those of Euronews
Last month, Nicki Minaj announced that she would be pushing back the release of her fourth studio album Queen. Despite the delay, the reigning queen of rap never disappoints her loyal followers. Today, she surprised fans by revealing the official cover art created by Mert Alas. In a post on Instagram, she describes the album as her “greatest work to date.”
As we continue to wait for her majesty, at least Nicki has another collaboration with Ariana Grande on the way—“The Light Is Coming” should be arriving any day now).
A post shared by Ariana Grande (@arianagrande) on 
In other news, Solange’s Saint Heron is collaborating with IKEA. Get all the details

Tell me moreMigrants: Victims of divisions within the EU?

Now Reading: 
Migrants: Victims of divisions within the EU?
Migrants: Victims of divisions within the EU?
TEXT SIZEAaAa
In this edition of 'Insiders' we take you to a tiny border area in the Alps where dozens of migrants cross every month from Italy into France, sometimes risking their lives on narrow mountain paths.
Unwanted and shunned by both countries, they have to rely on volunteers who step in for the authorities and, by doing so, risk fines and even prison for helping out.
Their story epitomises what is clearly not working when it comes to Europe’s immigration policy.
Marred by political divisions and bureaucratic hurdles, Europe hasn't managed to enforce a coherent immigration policy to say the least. Rather it relies on the goodwill (or lack of) its member states.
While Germany has taken in the lion’s share of asylum seekers since their number peaked in 2015, Poland or Hungary, for example, have refused to even respect migrant quotas set by the European Union.
Italy and Greece complain, quite rightfully so, that their geographic location makes them a landing pad for most, if not all, migrants seeking a better future in Europe.
Other countries like France have fared below expectations, especially when it comes to relocating migrants transiting through Italy and Greece.
Then there’s the whole debate over political versus economic migrants, with the latter mostly hailing from poverty-ravaged sub-Saharan Africa and largely unwanted in Europe.

Mountain path of danger and solidarity

At the Alpine border between Italy and France, our reporter Valérie Gauriat witnessed for herself the atmosphere of tension. Migrants risk their lives to try to cross the mountains undetected while volunteers from the local population go to extraordinary lengths to help them. A number of migrants have died recently in their attempted crossing into France.
Mountain-dwellers come to the aid of migrants in the absence of official reception facilities while far-right activists make it their business to try to stop the newcomers from getting through.

Yves Pascouau on EU migration policy: "There is no long-term vision"

At the end of the programme, we questioned immigration specialist Yves Pascouau, associate senior research fellow at the Jacques Delors Institute and researcher at the University of Nantes, where he holds the Schengen Chair, created as part of the Alliance Europa programme. He also edits EuropeanMigrationLaw.eu.
He regrets that EU member states don't have a united approach to migration, arguing that they remain divided on reforms to the Dublin Regulation and don't have an appropriate response to climate refugees.

It’s Official! Buhari Wins 2019 Election

President Muhammadu Buhari has won the 2019 presidential election, polling 15,191,847 votes  to defeat his closest rival, Alhaji Atiku ...

Popular Posts